You guys realize that people can criticize GRRM and his writing...
even if they haven’t fucking made the NYT bestseller list?
I fucking hate that “Oh come back to me when you’ve had an NYT bestseller!” bullshit.
QUANTITY DOES NOT EQUAL QUALITY. I don’t see this argument being used in favor to support the literary merits of Twilight.
I’m tired of seeing GRRM’s fans use ADWD’s place on the NYT list as a defense of the book when faced with criticism (I’m looking at you Linda!). ADWD is a mediocre book, and it’s success is based on 3 hugely popular books and a 4th book that people hoped was a fluke. People have been waiting 6 years for ADWD and he’s picked up a huge amount of new readers with GoT, no wonder the book is doing well.
People have every right to be critical of George’s writing, especially now that he doesn’t even have a great plot to excuse such travesties as the Myrish swamp or the in-depth study of river turtles.
Deal with it.